Potentially Polluting Wrecks and the Legal Duty to Protect Our Ocean Heritage-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Potentially Polluting Wrecks and the Legal Duty to Protect Our Ocean Heritage

Published:2024 Issue: Volume: Page:11-23
ISSN:1861-6623
Container-title:SpringerBriefs in Archaeology
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Aznar Mariano J.,Varmer Ole

Abstract

AbstractAs said in the introduction to this book, the determination of a shipwreck as environmentally hazardous or potentially polluting does not negate its significance as a historic site (Brennan, Chap. 1, this volume). Practice shows how wrecks may be different things at the same time: a lost property, an artificial reef, a gravesite, an obstacle for navigation, or/and a historic site and a potentially polluting wreck. This makes them a complex object for regulation, both at the domestic and international level.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-57960-8_2

Reference8 articles.

1. Aznar, M. J. (2014). The contiguous zone as archaeological zone. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 28, 1–51.

2. Aznar, M. J. (2015). Regarding ‘les épaves de navires en haute mer et le droit international. Le cas du Mont-Louis by Guido Starkle (1984/1985-I):’ Sensitive wrecks, protecting them and protecting from them. Revue belge de droit international, 1–2, 32–46.

3. Aznar, M. J. (2019). The notions of ‘preferential right’ and ‘interest’ of sates in the protection of the underwater cultural heritage. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 38, 1–37.

4. Forrest, C. (2019). Maritime legacies and the law. Effective legal governance of WWI wrecks. E. Elgar Publishers.

5. ICJ. (2022). Alleged violations of sovereign rights and maritime spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua V. Colombia), Judgement of 22 April 2022.