Using the Cultures Framework for Policy Analysis

Author:

Stephenson Janet

Abstract

AbstractCultural analysis has much to offer policy development. It complements policy approaches that see society as comprised of individuals, offering a way of accounting for broader influences on behaviour than economic maximisation and broadly shared psychological traits. In a world where ‘information deficit’, ‘rational actors’ and ‘nudge theory’ dominate policy conversations, culture offers more nuanced understandings and reveals new opportunities for policy action. This chapter describes examples of policy recommendations that have been developed from research using the cultures framework. It proposes a series of steps, using the framework, for the development of policy or other interventions. The framework can also be used to underpin policy evaluation, guiding the assessment of proximal outcomes (changes to cultural ensembles) as well as distal outcomes (changes to measures of sustainability) that result from an intervention.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference41 articles.

1. Barton, B., Blackwell, S., Carrington, G., Ford, R., Lawson, R., Stephenson, J., Thorsnes, P., & Williams, J. (2013). Energy cultures: Implication for policymakers. Centre for Sustainability, University of Otago.

2. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2018). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 253–297). Routledge.

3. Borrás, S., & Edler, J. (2020). The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems’ transformation. Research Policy, 49(5), 103971.

4. Carrus, G., Tiberio, L., Panno, A., Lettmayer, G., Kaltenegger, I., Demir, M. H., Biresselioglu, M. E., Solak, B., Dimitrova, E., Tasheva-Petrova, M., & Mutafchiiska, I. (2019). Analysis of enabling factors for consumer action. ECHOES Research report, NTNU, Norway.

5. Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E., & Sovacool, B. (2018). Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research and Social Science, 37, 175–190.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3