Author:
Schmitt Marco,Häußling Roger,Böschen Stefan
Abstract
AbstractThere are calls for transformation in all places, but the starting point for a sociology of transformation is anything but simple. A sociology of transformation must be thought and designed in the triad of transformation research, transformative research, and research transformation. This means the provision of knowledge on how transformations take place, social science research that uses this knowledge to intervene in social and societal processes in a targeted way, and reflection on how sociology itself changes as a discipline due to such action and socio-political expectations. Against this background, the article starts from the assumption that a sociological perspective (combining the relational approaches of network and field theory) specifically tailored to the current transformation conditions and challenges (exemplified in a case study) can make a significant contribution to understanding as well as shaping transformation processes based on a joint reflection of possibilities.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference44 articles.
1. Arendt H (1954) On the nature of totalitarianism: an essay in understanding. Hannah Arendt Papers of the Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. https://www.academia.edu/33478143/Arendt_On_the_Nature_of_Totalitarianism_An_Essay_in_Understanding_1954_. Accessed Sept 2023
2. Baier C, Schmitz A (2012) Organisationen als Akteure in sozialen Feldern—Eine Modellierungsstrategie am Beispiel deutscher Hochschulen. In: Bernhard S, Schmidt-Wellenburg C (eds) Feldanalyse als forschungspgoramm. Springer VS, Wiesbaden, pp 191–220
3. Blühdorn I (2013) The governance of unsustainability: ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn. Environ Polit 22:16–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.755005
4. Böschen S (2016) Hybride Wissensregime: Skizze einer soziologischen Feldtheorie. Nomos, Baden-Baden
5. Böschen S (2017) Wissensgesellschaft. In: Sommer M, Müller-Wille S, Reinhardt C (eds) Handbuch wissenschaftsgeschichte. Metzler, Stuttgart, pp 324–332