Engaging Stakeholders with Platform Labour: The Social Lab Approach

Author:

Tabarés Raúl,Bartolomé Tatiana,García Jorge

Abstract

AbstractIn recent years, co-creation, experimentation and prototyping has been embraced by public administrations as a means of making policymaking more porous to societal needs. In this regard, social labs have emerged as a way of enabling “safe spaces” where policymakers can obtain new perspectives and approaches from a plethora of stakeholders combining academia, industry, public administration and society as a whole. These labs try to address the complexities, particularities and demands of modern society whilst trying to represent different interests and voices. In this chapter, we offer some insights extracted from a particular experience called the Social Policy Lab (SOPO Lab), which focused on the economic, labour and socio-ethical implications of platform labour in seven European cities (Barcelona, Bologna, Berlin, London, Lisbon, Paris and Tallinn) that are affected by the economic externalities of four digital platforms (Airbnb, Deliveroo, Helpling and Uber). We argue that social labs can provide room to facilitate close collaboration between policymakers and other underrepresented stakeholders, as well as establish synergies between them to counteract the diverse side-effects that digital platforms have in urban settings.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference34 articles.

1. Bradford, A. (2020). The Brussels effect. How the European union rules the world. Oxford University Press.

2. Bogner, A. (2012). The Paradox of participation experiments. Science Technology and Human Values, 37(5), 506–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911430398

3. Chautard, A., & Hann, C. (2019). Developing inclusive conferences. https://reachwater.org.uk/resource/best-practice-guide-developing-inclusive-conferences/

4. Chicchi, F., Frapporti, M., Marrone, M., & Pirone, M. (2020). COVID-19 Impact on Platform Economy: A Preliminary Outlook. Bologna. http://amsacta.unibo.it/6471/1/Covid-19ImpactonPlatformeconomy.APreliminaryoutlook.pdf

5. Dekker, R., Contreras, J. F., & Meijer, A. (2020). The living lab as a methodology for public administration research: A systematic literature review of its applications in the social sciences. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(14), 1207–1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1668410

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3