Exploring Interventions on Social Outcomes with In Silico, Agent-Based Experiments

Author:

Squazzoni Flaminio,Bianchi Federico

Abstract

AbstractAgent-Based Modeling (ABM) is a computational method used to examine social outcomes emerging from interaction between heterogeneous agents by computer simulation. It can be used to understand the effect of initial conditions on complex outcomes by exploring fine-grained (multiple-scale, spatial/temporal) observations on the aggregate consequences of agent interaction. By performing in silico experimental tests on policy interventions where ex ante predictions of outcomes are difficult, it can also reduce costs, explore assumptions and boundary conditions, as well as overcome ethical constraints associated with the use of randomized controlled trials in behavioral policy. Here, we introduce the essential elements of ABM and present two simple examples where we assess the hypothetical impact of certain policy interventions while considering different possible reactions of individuals involved in the context. Although highly abstract, these examples suggest that ABM can be either a complement or an alternative to behavioral policy methods, especially when understanding social processes and exploring direct and indirect effects of interventions are important. Prospects and critical problems of these in silico policy experiments are then discussed.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference49 articles.

1. Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation. Agent-based model of competition and collaboration. Princeton University Press.

2. Battistin, E., & Bertoni, M. (this volume). Counterfactuals with experimental and quasi-experimental variation. In A. Damonte & F. Negri (Eds.), Causality in policy studies – A pluralist toolbox. Springer.

3. Bianchi, F., Grimaldo, F., Bravo, G., & Squazzoni, F. (2018). The peer review game: An agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures. Scientometrics, 116(3), 1401–1420.

4. Bianchi, F., & Squazzoni, F. (2015). Agent-based models in sociology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 7(4), 284–306.

5. Bianchi, F., & Squazzoni, F. (2016). Is three better than one? Simulating the effect of reviewer selection and behavior on the quality and efficiency of peer review. In L. Yilmaz, W. K. V. Chan, I. Moon, T. M. K. Roeder, C. Macal, & M. D. Rossetti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 winter simulation conference (pp. 4081–4089). IEEE Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3