A Qualitative Similarity Framework for the Interpretation of Natural Language Similarity Expressions

Author:

Gust Helmar,Umbach Carla

Abstract

AbstractIn this paper, a representational framework is presented featuring a qualitative notion of similarity. It is aimed at issues of natural language semantics, in particular the semantics of expressions of similarity and sameness and their role in comparison and ad-hoc kind formation. The framework makes use of attribute spaces, which are well-established in AI and also in some branches of natural language semantics, e.g., frame-based approaches (Barsalou 1992). What distinguishes attribute spaces and representations as proposed in this paper is the idea of systems of predicates on attribute spaces corresponding to predicates on the domain. On the worldy side, a domain includes a set of relevant predicates talking about individuals. These predicates have counterparts on the representational side talking about points of an attribute space. Counterpart predicates are required to be consistent with their originals; more precisely, they have to agree in truth-value on the set of positive and negative exemplars thereby approximating the original predicates. Moreover, counterpart predicates will be assumed to have convex and open extensions. This system facilitates a qualitative notion of similarity which is suited to account for the meaning of natural language similarity expressions and, furthermore, their role in comparison and ad-hoc kind formation.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference31 articles.

1. Anderson, C., & Morzycki, M. (2015). Degrees as kinds. NLLT, 33(3).

2. Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 211–222.

3. Barsalou, L. W. (1992). Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In E. Kittay & A. Lehrer (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

4. Carlson, G. (1980). Reference to kinds in English. Garland.

5. Carlson, G. (2010). Generics and concepts. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Kinds, things and stuff (pp. 16–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Thedoubt-whetherpuzzle;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

2. Locating the locative in English pseudo-locativewhere-relatives;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

3. ‘Why’ without asking in Romanian;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

4. Asking about the reason for an effect, and some consequences for the analysis ofwh-interrogatives;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

5. Embedding force and attitude;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3