Shaping the EU’s Future? Europarties, European Parliament’s Political Groups and the Conference on the Future of Europe

Author:

Johansson Karl Magnus,Raunio Tapio

Abstract

AbstractEuroparties and the European Parliament (EP) political groups have decades of experience from constitutional reform processes. These partisan actors have influenced EU Treaty amendments while also proving inventive in designing new practices that have over time found their way into the Treaties. Drawing on interviews and parliamentary and party documents, this chapter explores the different avenues and strategies the three largest Europarties—European People’s Party, Party of European Socialists, Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe—and their EP groups utilised for shaping the agenda of the Conference on the Future of Europe. It examines the distribution of power between Europarties and the EP groups and pays particular attention to dynamics inside the EP political groups, arguing that the agenda-setting stage of the Conference was strongly influenced by group leaders and other more senior, individual MEPs, many of whom are seasoned veterans of inter-institutional bargaining and EU constitutional development.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference41 articles.

1. Ackrill, R., Kay, A., & Zahariadis, N. (2013). Ambiguity, multiple streams, and EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 871–887.

2. Bardi, L. (2020). The heart of the core: The EPP group in the EU institutional and political framework. In L. Bardi, W. Gagatek, C. Germond, K. M. Johansson, W. Kaiser, & S. Sassano (Eds.), The European ambition: The group of the European People’s Party and European integration (pp. 255–334). Nomos.

3. Bardi, L., Bressanelli, E., Calossi, E., Cicchi, L., Gagatek, W., & Pizzimenti, E. (2014). Political parties and political foundations at European level. Challenges and opportunities. The European Parliament.

4. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. University of Chicago Press.

5. Béland, D., & Howlett, M. (2016). The role and impact of multiple-streams approach in comparative policy research. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 18(3), 221–227.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3