Research Biobanking, Personal Data Protection and Implementation of the GDPR in France

Author:

Chassang Gauthier,Hisbergues Michael,Rial-Sebbag Emmanuelle

Abstract

AbstractSince 1978 and the initial French data protection law (Loi n°78-17 du 6 Janvier 1978), consecutive modifications regarding the protection of personal health data, especially in 2004, 2016 and 2018, set up a strict legal regime for processing sensitive personal data, including for research purposes. In recent years, French law has evolved proactively and in parallel with the work of the European Union (EU) on the preparation of what became the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which has been in force since May 2018. This Chapter performs a state-of-art analysis (as of 1 July 2019) of the French legal framework for research biobanks and data protection rules applying to biobanking, in particular those related to data subjects’ rights and Article 89 of the GDPR. Firstly, it provides updated information about the national landscape of active research biobanks in France (Sect. 1). Secondly, it explores how the French law embodies the developments brought by the GDPR and how it envisages individuals’ rights in the context of research biobanking (Sects. 2 and 3). Thirdly, this Chapter analyses existing and potential national exemptions to individuals’ rights, including with regard to Article 89 GDPR, and how France conceives of processing activities of ‘public interest’ (Sect. 4). Finally, the authors address ongoing debates around bioethics law in France and argue for the creation of a specific Act focused on biobanking as a means of integrating, clarifying and developing not only data protection rules but also other activities related to samples, human or not, in a unique, operational and compact act (Sect. 5).

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference6 articles.

1. Borella L, Dupont M, Hebert JC, Janin A, Lubin R. Pour l’INCA (2006) Charte Ethique des Tumorothèques. Ed. 2010

2. Clément B, Duyckaerts C, Hauw JJ, Ardaillou R (2019) Rapporteurs au nom de la Commission Biologie-génétique-technologie biomédicales. Académie Nationale de Médecine. Rapport. Sustainability of biological resource centres: a major challenge for biomedical research

3. Polton D, Caillé Y (2017) Cabinet Simmons & Simmons, pour l’INDS. Expertise juridique sur l’intérêt public dans le contexte des données de santé. V.2

4. Roche T (2018) Delsol Avocats. Article. ePub. Les coordonnées du DPO du promoteur ne doivent pas figurer sur les fiches d’information destinées aux personnes se prêtant à des recherches cliniques ! http://www.delsolavocats.fr/sdv/en/les-coordonnees-du-dpo-du-promoteur-ne-doivent-pas-figurer-sur-les-fiches-dinformation-destinees-aux-personnes-se-pretant-a-des-recherches-cliniques/

5. Sariyar M, Schlünder I (2016) Reconsidering anonymization-related concepts and the term “identification” against the backdrop of the European legal framework. Biopreserv Biobank 14(5):367–374

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3