Author:
Chassang Gauthier,Hisbergues Michael,Rial-Sebbag Emmanuelle
Abstract
AbstractSince 1978 and the initial French data protection law (Loi n°78-17 du 6 Janvier 1978), consecutive modifications regarding the protection of personal health data, especially in 2004, 2016 and 2018, set up a strict legal regime for processing sensitive personal data, including for research purposes. In recent years, French law has evolved proactively and in parallel with the work of the European Union (EU) on the preparation of what became the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which has been in force since May 2018. This Chapter performs a state-of-art analysis (as of 1 July 2019) of the French legal framework for research biobanks and data protection rules applying to biobanking, in particular those related to data subjects’ rights and Article 89 of the GDPR. Firstly, it provides updated information about the national landscape of active research biobanks in France (Sect. 1). Secondly, it explores how the French law embodies the developments brought by the GDPR and how it envisages individuals’ rights in the context of research biobanking (Sects. 2 and 3). Thirdly, this Chapter analyses existing and potential national exemptions to individuals’ rights, including with regard to Article 89 GDPR, and how France conceives of processing activities of ‘public interest’ (Sect. 4). Finally, the authors address ongoing debates around bioethics law in France and argue for the creation of a specific Act focused on biobanking as a means of integrating, clarifying and developing not only data protection rules but also other activities related to samples, human or not, in a unique, operational and compact act (Sect. 5).
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference6 articles.
1. Borella L, Dupont M, Hebert JC, Janin A, Lubin R. Pour l’INCA (2006) Charte Ethique des Tumorothèques. Ed. 2010
2. Clément B, Duyckaerts C, Hauw JJ, Ardaillou R (2019) Rapporteurs au nom de la Commission Biologie-génétique-technologie biomédicales. Académie Nationale de Médecine. Rapport. Sustainability of biological resource centres: a major challenge for biomedical research
3. Polton D, Caillé Y (2017) Cabinet Simmons & Simmons, pour l’INDS. Expertise juridique sur l’intérêt public dans le contexte des données de santé. V.2
4. Roche T (2018) Delsol Avocats. Article. ePub. Les coordonnées du DPO du promoteur ne doivent pas figurer sur les fiches d’information destinées aux personnes se prêtant à des recherches cliniques ! http://www.delsolavocats.fr/sdv/en/les-coordonnees-du-dpo-du-promoteur-ne-doivent-pas-figurer-sur-les-fiches-dinformation-destinees-aux-personnes-se-pretant-a-des-recherches-cliniques/
5. Sariyar M, Schlünder I (2016) Reconsidering anonymization-related concepts and the term “identification” against the backdrop of the European legal framework. Biopreserv Biobank 14(5):367–374