Abstract
AbstractIn this chapter, an analysis is undertaken of the division of legislative power in the space created by the GDPR, regarding the balancing of individual rights, the public interest and biobank research. The legislative competences of the EU, international obligations within bioethics, and the regulatory space left for Member States are all examined. The conclusion of the chapter is that in spite of the aim of the GDPR to further legal harmonisation, it is more likely that unity will be brought about through administrative cooperation and soft law tools.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference13 articles.
1. Busby H, Hervey T, Mohr A (2008) Ethical EU law? The influence of the European group on ethics in science and new technologies. Eur Law Rev 33:803–842
2. Dove ES (2015) Biobanks, data sharing, and the drive for a global privacy governance framework. J Law Med Eth 43(4):675–689
3. Giurgiu A, Larsen TA (2016) Roles and powers of national data protection authorities. Eur Data Prot Law Rev 2:342–352
4. Gottweis H et al (2012) Biobanks for Europe. A Challenge for Governance, Report of the Expert Group with Ethical and Regulatory Challenges of International Biobank Research. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European Commission, Brussels
5. Hijmans H (2016) The DPAs and their cooperation: how far are we in making enforcement of data protection law more European. Eur Data Prot Law Rev 2:362–372
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献