Author:
Kovalenko Tatyana,Sornette Didier
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference18 articles.
1. Aerts, D., Aerts Arguëlles, J., Beltran, L., Beltran, L., Sassoli de Bianchi, M., Sozzo, S., & Veloz, T. (2017). Testing quantum models of conjunction fallacy on the world wide web. International Journal of Theoretical Physics.
2. Busemeyer, J. R., Pothos, E. M., Franco, R., & Trueblood, J. S. (2011). A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. Psychological review, 118(2), 193.
3. Favre, M., Wittwer, A., Heinimann, H. R., Yukalov, V. I., & Sornette, D. (2016). Quantum decision theory in simple risky choices. PLoS ONE, 12(11), 2016.
4. Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The ‘conjunction fallacy’ revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors. Journal of behavioral decision making, 12(4), 275.
5. Rosner, B. (1983). Percentage points for a generalized esd many-outlier procedure. Technometrics, 25(2), 165–172.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献