Immigration Policy in South Africa: Public Opinion, Xenophobia and the Search for Progress

Author:

Gordon Steven Lawrence

Abstract

AbstractDeveloping progressive migration policy and legislation in South Africa is significantly hampered by anti-immigrant sentiment amongst the general public. Despite the recommendations of experts, the country has not adopted a clear and coherent immigration integration policy. Moreover, xenophobic violence presents a clear threat to the current South African migration regime. Why has this young democracy struggled to develop meaningful policy solutions to deal with migration? The paper explores this important question through the unique lens of mass opinion. Data from the South African Social Attitudes Survey for the period 2003–2018 will be used for this study. The outcomes of this analysis offer new insights into the obstacles facing attempts to implement both progressive immigration policy as well as anti-xenophobia strategies in South Africa. The paper concludes by outlining the implications of this work for academic attempts to understand address anti-immigrantism in the country. Recommendations for future research are also presented for discussion.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference29 articles.

1. Abebe, T. T. (2017). Migration policy frameworks in Africa. Institute for Security Studies. https://issafrica.org/research/africa-report/migration-policy-frameworks-in-africa. Accessed 24 Apr 2021.

2. African Union Commission (AUC). (2015). Agenda 2063. African Union Commission. https://au.int/en/agenda2063/. Accessed 2 Apr 2021.

3. African Union Commission (AUC). (2018). Revised migration policy framework for Africa and plan of action (2018–2030). African Union Commission. https://au.int/sites/default/files/newsevents/workingdocuments/32718-wd-english_revised_au_migration_policy_framework_for_africa.pdf. Accessed 3 Apr 2021.

4. Bhorat, H., Cassim, A., Ewinyu, A., & Steenkamp, F. (2017). Social protection and inequality in Africa: Exploring the interactions. In H. Bhorat, K. Naidoo, A. Odusola, G. A. Cornia, & P. Conceição (Eds.), Income inequality trends in Sub-Saharan Africa: Divergence, determinants, and consequences (pp. 178–201). United Nations Development Programme. https://doi.org/10.18356/62569a39-en

5. Bilali, R., & Vollhardt, J. R. (2019). Victim and perpetrator groups’ divergent perspectives on collective violence: Implications for intergroup relations. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12570

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3