Author:
Pastra Aspasia,Núñez-Sánchez Miguel Juan,Kartsimadakis Anastasios,Johansson Tafsir Matin,Klenum Thomas,Aschert Thomas,Lennan Mitchell,Papaioannou Marina G.,Theodorou Maria
Abstract
AbstractState-of-the-art remote inspection techniques (RIT), namely unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), and magnetic crawlers are the resultants of a cascade of technological innovation. RIT usage has gathered momentum since classification societies turned to manuals alternatives during COVID-19 pandemic. Capable of gathering complex data through real-time visual imagery, it is claimed that RIT has the potential to deliver inspection services more safely and efficiently, thus enabling the transformative digitalization of the “ship survey” landscape. The paradigm shift has begun. In this scope, the multi-robot (ship-hull) survey platforms explored by classification societies and service suppliers have the potential to alter the manner in which massive structures are currently being inspected and maintained. This change will eventually improve shipping competitiveness, thus, paving the way for better and safer regulations and standards. Notwithstanding, the current framework derived from international common minimum standards, while noteworthy and creditable, continues to facilitate a number of thorny issues that could arise post-deployment of available techniques. This chapter highlights crucial elements that could altogether serve as a pathway forward against incidental issues acting as market growth barriers resulting in an unwanted impasse in this paradigm shift. This chapter derives from research conducted under the European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 funded project titled Autonomous Robotic Inspection and Maintenance on Ship Hulls (BUG-WRIGHT2) under grant agreement No. 871260.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference34 articles.
1. Adland, R., Cariou, P., Jia, H., & Wolff, F. C. (2018). The energy efficiency effects of periodic ship hull cleaning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.247
2. Al-Badi, A., Tarhini, A., & Khan, A. I. (2018). Exploring big data governance frameworks. Procedia Computer Science, 141, 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.181
3. Alexandropoulou, V., Johansson, T. M., Kontaxaki, K., Pastra, A., & Dalaklis, D. (2021). Maritime remote inspection in hull survey & inspection: A synopsis of liability issues from a European union context. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 5(4), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/25725084.2021.2006463
4. American Bureau of Shipping (ABS). (2022). Guidance notes on the use of remote inspection technologies. https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/rules-and-guides/current/other/242-gn-remote-inspection-tech-2022/rit-gn-may22.pdf (Accessed 02 July 2022).
5. BugWright2 (undated). The BUGWRIGHT2 EU Horizon project (webpage). https://www.bugwright2.eu/ (Accessed 1 September 2022).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献