Abstract
AbstractIn this chapter I provide some background on the reasons (I think) a traditional fund company might want to introduce a modern tontine as it relates to the unique challenges that people face managing their financial affairs towards the end of the human lifecycle.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference29 articles.
1. Ayuso, M., Bravo, J. M., Holzmann, R., & Palmer, E. (2021). Automatic indexation of the pension age to life expectancy: When policy design matters. Risks, 9(5), 1–28.
2. Boon, L. N., Brière, M., & Werker, B. J. (2020). Systematic longevity risk: To bear or to insure? Journal of Pension Economics & Finance, 19(3), 409–441.
3. Bernhardt, T., & Donnelly, C. (2019). Modern tontine with bequest: innovation in pooled annuity products, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 86, 168–188.
4. Bernhardt, T., & Donnelly, C. (2021). Quantifying the trade-off between income stability and the number of members in a pooled annuity fund. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 51(1), 101–130.
5. Bräutigam, M., Guillén, M., & Nielsen, J. P. (2017). Facing up to longevity with old actuarial methods: a comparison of pooled funds and income tontines, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 42(3), 406–422.