1. Adler E, Haas PM (1992) Conclusion: epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. Int Organ 46(1):367–390
2. Allen MR, Dube OP, Solecki W, Aragón-Durand F, Cramer W, Humphreys S et al (2018) Framing and context. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pörtner HO, Roberts D, Skea J, Shukla PR et al (eds) Global warming of 1.5 °C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, IPCC, pp 49–92
3. Anshelm J, Hultman M (2015) Discourses of global climate change. Apocalyptic framing and political antagonisms. Routledge, London
4. Asayama S (2014) Catastrophism toward ‘opening up’ or ‘closing down’? Going beyond the apocalyptic future and geoengineering. Curr Sociol 63(1):89–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392114559849
5. Asayama S, Sugiyama M, Ishii A (2017) Ambivalent climate of opinions: tensions and dilemmas in understanding geoengineering experimentation. Geoforum 80:82–92