1. Alwang, M. (1996). Steering the most appropriate course between admiralty and insolvency: Why an international insolvency treaty should recognize the primacy of admiralty law over maritime assets. Fordham Law Review, 64, 2613–2646.
2. Ang, B. (2016, November 29). Arrest and insolvency: The legal tensions between two regimes - The Singapore experience with cross-border insolvency. Singapore: Publications Supreme Court. Retrieved June 10, 2018 from http://www.supremecourt.gov.sg/Data/Editor/Documents/Arrest%20and%20Insolvency%20Paper%2020%20Nov%202016%20with%20non-circulation%20notation%20submitted%2021Nov%20amended%209Decamlatest.pdf
3. Berlingieri, G. (2014). Defaulting Ship-owners and the regulation of their insolvency status. Comité Maritime Internationale. Retrieved June 10, 2018 from http://www.comitemaritime.org/Cross-Border-Insolvency/0,27129,112932,00.html
4. Bork, R. (2012). Rescuing companies in England and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Brambusch, J. (2014, March 19). Schiffsfonds tricksen bei Insolvenzen. Capital - Wirtschaft ist Gesellschaft. Retrieved June 10, 2018 from http://www.capital.de/dasmagazin/schiffsfonds-tricksen-bei-insolvenzen.html