Abstract
AbstractSemi-confinement measures around the COVID-19 pandemic led to disruptions in everyday lives, in particular when it comes to reconfiguring habitual and routinized ways of doing things—a central theme in a social practice approach to understanding consumption. This contribution considers the weekly journal entries of 95 students in an undergraduate class at the University of Geneva, documenting how their consumption-related practices were changing, and how such changes relate to ‘sustainable wellbeing’. Students describe thrift and frugality measures in relation to resource consumption, reconsider existing practices such as ‘being fashionable’, but also explore new practices, such as preparing elaborate meals. In terms of wellbeing, consuming resources was clearly less relevant to students than social relations, whether facilitated through information-communication technologies or at a physical distance, as well as experiencing some form of contact with nature. We found that it is possible to engage students in reflecting on the normative goal of need satisfaction, and for students to distinguish between needs and desires, and between needs and their means of satisfaction. The societal context of the pandemic also led to reflections around how wellbeing must be understood at both an individual and societal level, and how ‘sustainable wellbeing’ as a normative aim might be planned for in the future.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference65 articles.
1. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1944/1993). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception (1944). In J. Continuum (ed) Dialectic of enlightenment. Continuum
2. Akenji, L. (2014). Consumer scapegoatism and limits to green consumerism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 13–23.
3. Anantharaman, M. (2018). Critical sustainable consumption: A research agenda. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 8(4), 553–561.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction critique sociale du jugement. Les Editions de Minuit.
5. Brand, U., Muraca, B., Pineault, E., et al. (2021). From planetary to societal boundaries: An argument for collectively defined self-limitation. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17(1), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754