Author:
Cserti-Szauer Csilla,Sándor Anikó,Katona Vanda,Könczei György
Abstract
AbstractDue to the traditionally highly hierarchical nature of science, close connection with praxis is not always smooth. Participatory approaches can significantly support the balancing of power and the connection of academic theory with practice. In (Critical) Disability Studies, it is particularly important that user needs are met through co-productive design, and implementation. In this chapter after providing the theoretical foundation of (Critical) Disability Studies, our experiences are summarized in research, teaching, and service development, highlighting the strengths and challenges of the participatory approach to enrich the social innovation ecosystem. Finally, the chapter points out the adaptation and many possibilities of the participatory method that might create inclusive networks and communities in higher education.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference75 articles.
1. Antal, Z. S. (2017). Kölcsönös tisztelet és nyitottság. Participatív beszámoló egy fogyatékosságtudományi kutatásról [Mutual Respect and Openness]. Új Pedagógiai Szemle, 5-6, 77–84.
2. Atkinson, D. (2004). Research and empowerment: Involving people with learning difficulties in oral and life history research. Disability & Society, 19(7), 691–702.
3. Atkinson, D. (2005). Research as social work: Participatory research in learning disability. British Journal of Social Work, 35(4), 425–434.
4. Bánfalvy, C. S.. (2020). The social integration of disabled persons. The Contribution of Education and Employment Fogyatékosság és Társadalom, Special Issue, 10–28. https://doi.org/10.31287/FT.en.2020.2.3.
5. Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing ’emancipatory’ disability research. Disability & Society, 18(1), 3–17.