Three Mile Island: An Unresolved Paradox-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Three Mile Island: An Unresolved Paradox

Published:2024 Issue: Volume: Page:59-70
ISSN:
Container-title:Dirty Secrets of Nuclear Power in an Era of Climate Change
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Brugge Doug,Datesman Aaron

Abstract

AbstractThere is biological evidence of injury to human beings due to the 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island Unit 2 nuclear power station. The evidence that exists may not have been given a proper hearing because authority is largely anchored to the community of engineering and the physical sciences.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-59595-0_6

Reference9 articles.

1. Aamodt, M., & Aamodt, N. (1984). Petitioners v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Aamodt motions for investigation of licensee’s reports of radioactive releases during the initial days of the TMI-2 accident and postponement of restart decision pending resolution of this investigation. Docket Number 50-289. Administrative Court, Washington, DC, 21 June.

2. Beyea, J. (1985a). Proceedings of the Workshop on Three Mile Island Dosimetry (Vol. 1, p. 124). Three Mile Island Public Health Fund and the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.

3. Beyea, J. (1985b). Proceedings of the Workshop on Three Mile Island Dosimetry (Vol. 2, p. B129). Three Mile Island Public Health Fund and the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.

4. Datesman, A. M. (2020). Radiobiological shot noise explains Three Mile Island biodosimetry indicating nearly 1,000 mSv exposures. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 10933. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67826-5

5. Hatch, M. C., Beyea, J., Nieves, J. W., & Susser, M. (1990). Cancer near the three-mile Island nuclear plant: radiation emissions. American Journal of Epidemiology, 132(3), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115673