Abstract
AbstractThis chapter reviews the Richardson arms race model: a pair of differential equations which capture an action reaction process. Whereas many of Richardson’s equations were quite specific about what they referred to, the arms race model was not. This lack of specificity was both a strength and a weakness. Its strength was that with different interpretations it could be applied as an organising structure in a wide variety of contexts. Its weakness was that the model could not be estimated or tested without some auxiliary interpretation. The chapter considers the impact of these issues in interpretation and empirical application on the influence of the Richardson arms race model.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference20 articles.
1. Beckmann, Klaus; Susan Gattke, Anja Lechner & Lennart Reimer (2016) A critique of the Richardson Equations. Economics Working Paper, Helmut Schmidt University (162).
2. Brito, Dagobert L & Michael D Intriligator (1999) Increasing returns to scale and the arms race: The end of the Richardson paradigm? Defence and Peace Economics 10(1): 39–54.
3. Dawkins, Richard & John R Kreps (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 205(1161): 489–511.
4. Diehl, Paul F (2020) What Richardson got right (and wrong) about arms races and war. Ch. 4 in this volume.
5. Dunne, J Paul & Ron P Smith (2007) The econometrics of military arms races. Ch. 28 in: Todd Sandler & Keith Hartley (eds) Handbook of Defence Economics, 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 914–941.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献