Author:
O’Shea Sarah,May Josephine,Stone Cathy,Delahunty Janine
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter explores how the First-in-Family (FiF) cohort is theorised and defined in various geographical and cultural contexts. Beginning with a critique around a lack of clarity of this cohort, the chapter moves to a review of related topics within the broad field of university participation and student engagement. O’Shea, May, Stone and Delahunty demonstrate the ways in which the FiF group is collectively framed as ‘lacking’. This deficit is articulated through reference to cultural, social, familial, academic and economic capitals. The chapter discusses how this focus on lack only serves to further disenfranchise these learners, arguably contributing to a pervasive sense of dislocation within the higher education environment. Chapter 3 continues this discussion by ‘disrupting’ this deficit framing through reference to narrative vignettes derived from the research projects.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference59 articles.
1. Barsegyan, V., & Maas, I. (2022). First-generation students’ educational outcomes: A 9-years panel study on the role of parental educational, cultural, and economic capital. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/wt65s
2. Beattie, I. R., & Thiele, M. (2016). Connecting in class? College class size and inequality in academic social capital. The Journal of Higher Education., 87(3), 332–362. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2016.0017
3. Behrendt, L., Larkin, S., Griew, R., & Kelly, P. (2012). Review of higher education access and outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people: Final Report. DET, Australian Government, 328.
4. Biddle, N., & Priest, N. (2015, September 29). Racism hits Indigenous students’ attendance and grades. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/racism-hits-indigenous-students-attendance-and-grades-48233.
5. Bin-Sallik, M. (2003). Cultural safety: Let’s name it! The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 32, 21–28.