The Impact of a Fantasy

Author:

Strand Roger

Abstract

AbstractPersonalized medicine is a sociotechnical imaginary: a collective vision for the coproduction of a future science, technology and society. This vision has long historical roots but is also the result of a specific context with ongoing changes in society, including the political economy of science. Part of this vision is a fantasy that runs counter to current scientific understanding of illness and disease. One may argue against such fantasies by appealing to facts. Such arguments tend to prove ineffective. If we can explain why they are ineffective this might shed light on possible implications of this state of affair. In this chapter, I draw on Rayner’s concept of “socially constructed ignorance” to indicate the non-modern character of the beliefs in fantasies of personalized medicine, while at the same time personalized medicine is yet another attempt to realize the Cartesian dream. Antonio Gramsci (Lettere dal carcere. Torino: Einaudi. English edition: Gramsci, A. 2011. Prison notebooks, Vol. I. Columbia University Press, New York, 1947) famously wrote: “The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.” Is the Cartesian dream coming to its end, with personalized medicine as a morbid symptom, a reductio ad absurdum? If so, what it the new that cannot be born?

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference26 articles.

1. ASCO. 2012. Shaping the future of oncology: Envisioning cancer care in 2030. https://connection.asco.org/magazine/exclusive-coverage/shaping-future-oncology-envisioning-cancer-care-2030. Accessed 17 July 2020.

2. Bernard, C. 1859. Introduction à l´étude de la médecine experimental. París: Collège de France. English edition: Bernard, C. 1957. Introduction to experimental medicine (trans: Greene, H. C.). New York: Dover Publications.

3. Blanchard, Anne, Caroline Engen, and Roger Strand. 2017. Precision countdown. Oral presentation at Anticipation 2017. London.

4. Blasimme, Alessandro. 2017. Health research meets big data: The science and politics of precision medicine. In Cancer biomarkers: Ethics, economics and society, ed. Anne Blanchard and Roger Strand, 95–109. Bergen: Megaloceros Press.

5. Blasimme, A., and E. Vayena. 2016. Becoming partners, retaining autonomy: Ethical considerations on the development of precision medicine. BMC Medical Ethics 17: 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0149-6.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Omics and AI in precision medicine: Maintaining socio-technical imaginaries by transforming technological assemblages;TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis;2023-12-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3