Abstract
AbstractThe topic of this chapter is court-connected mediation and how mediation has affected the court culture in civil cases in Finland. The focus is on the three following dimensions of the mediation system: on legislative, theoretical, and practical changes. The main normative change was the act that came into force in 2006. The new legislation led gradually to changes in practice as well. A significant amount of cases in the District Courts go to mediation today. The law defines judges also as mediators, and in practice many judges are trained and experienced mediators. Also, the theoretical framework for courts has expanded, since mediation theories constitute a relevant basis for the mediation process. The change in culture is also multidirectional. Not only has mediation moved into the legalistic court culture, but also the legal context affects mediation. Mediation has changed court culture by providing an alternative to court trial and it has brought new dimensions to the definition, role and function of courts of law.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference48 articles.
1. Aaltonen AK (2009) Lapsioikeus ja lapsen oikeus tuomioistuimissa. Edita, Helsinki
2. Aaltonen AK (2015) Huoltoriitojen sovittelu tuomioistuimessa. Kauppakamari, Helsinki
3. Aarnio A (1989) Laintulkinnan teoria: yleisen oikeustieteen oppikirja. WSOY, Juva
4. Adrian L (2012) Mellem retssag og rundbordssamtale: retsmægling i teori og praksis. Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag, København
5. Adrian L, Mykland S (2014) Creativity in court-connected mediation: myth or reality? Negot J 4:421–439
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献