(Re-)casting Epistemic Rights as Human Rights: Conceptual Conundrums for the Council of Europe

Author:

McGonagle Tarlach

Abstract

AbstractThe Council of Europe has developed an elaborate system for the protection of human rights across its 46 Member States. Its centrepiece is the European Convention on Human Rights—Europe’s most important human rights treaty. The system offers strong protection for the rights to freedom of expression and participation in public debate. These rights, which concern freedom of expression, information, and communication and the integrity of the processes leading to the creation and dissemination of content and knowledge, have clear epistemic underpinnings. But the Council of Europe has yet to set out a comprehensive, coherent vision of the epistemic dimension to these rights. The Council, and in particular its judicial organ, the European Court of Human Rights, has so far addressed epistemic aspects of human rights in an incidental way. This chapter explores the epistemic values that help shape expressive and participatory rights, enquiring whether a re-conceptualisation of epistemic rights as human rights could strengthen the human rights that they already appear to inform. The Council of Europe has been selected as a case-study for this exploratory analysis due to its well-developed regulatory and policy framework. The framework is sufficiently concrete and coherent to allow reflection on the practical implications of the proposed re-conceptualisation.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference45 articles.

1. CoE. (1950). Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), ETS No. 5, 4 November 1950 (entry into force: 3 September 1953).

2. CoE. (1997). Recommendation No. R (97)20 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on ‘hate speech’, 30 October 1997.

3. CoE. (2018). Recommendation CM/Rec(2018)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on media pluralism and transparency of media ownership, 7 March 2018.

4. CoE. (2022). Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)4 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on promoting a favourable environment for quality journalism in the digital age, 17 March 2022.

5. ECtHR. (1976). Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3