Public Service Media: From Epistemic Rights to Epistemic Justice

Author:

Michalis Maria,D’Arma Alessandro

Abstract

AbstractGrowing concerns in recent years over threats to the foundations of democratic societies posed by misinformation, hate speech, and other problems associated with digital communications have led to renewed calls for greater protection of epistemic rights within policy, advocacy, and academic fora. Institutionally mandated to promote citizenship, Public Service Media (PSM) organisations have an important role to play in supporting epistemic rights. We suggest four main conditions are required for this and in doing so we introduce the concept of epistemic injustice as a key to understanding the role of PSM. First, PSM are premised upon strong political commitment. At a time when this political commitment is dwindling, it is imperative that civil society, academia, and international organisations continue to make the case for PSM strong. Second, we argue that PSM need to evolve with the times and be allowed to use new transmission means, build new platforms, and innovate. Third, we argue that PSM have to move beyond supporting epistemic rights, as they have traditionally been bestowed, and contribute to epistemic justice, by questioning the existing power structures of knowledge. Finally, PSM need to work together with other educational and cultural institutions towards the creation of an epistemic commons, countering the privatisation of communitive spaces and striving to make knowledge accessible to all.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference42 articles.

1. Anderson, B. R. O. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism ([2nd ed.]). Verso.

2. Aslama Horowitz, M., & Nieminen, H. (2016). European public service media and communication rights. In G. F. Lowe & N. Yamamoto (Eds.), Crossing borders and boundaries in public service media RIPE@2015 (pp. 95–106). Nordicom.

3. Banerjee, I., & Seneviratne, K. (2005). Public service broadcasting: A best practice sourcebook. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141584

4. Barnley, R., & Hartmann, F. (2022). House of Lords Communications and Digital Committee inquiry into BBC future funding. Written evidence BFF0060, April 5. https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/107327/pdf/

5. BBC. (2021). BBC Group Annual Report and Accounts 2020/21. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1000946/BBC_Annual_Report_and_Accounts_2020-21.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3