Author:
Santoso M. Iman,Suroso Djoko Santoso Abi,Fitriyanto Muhammad S.,Suroso Muhammad S. P. A.,Krumme Klaus,Melkonyan-Gottschalk Ani,Noche Bernd
Abstract
AbstractThe dimensions of the triple bottom-line approach to sustainable development contain inherent conflicting goals in implementation. In cases of urban development around the world, this is exemplary for settings in major port cities. Here, mostly economically oriented infrastructure requirements of the ports meet more comprehensive concerns of sustainable urban development. There are incoherent governance systems: Ports are often involved in higher-level national planning hierarchies, while urban development is predominantly locally controlled. This is also the case in Jakarta Megapolitan with Tanjung Priok Port, Indonesia, the most prominent and still expanding national seaport. The port expansion is also aimed to be a significant hub in one of the world’s maritime axes, which refers to vast urban growth. However, the entire urban economic effects are uncertain, for example, concerning urban diseconomies of scale or rebound effects, such as traffic congestion, social segregation, conflicts, or the digital divide. Urbanization and the contemporary patterns of economic growth are drivers of environmental vulnerability of both parties. This study serves to overcome fragmented approaches by using a holistic, sustainable governance transition process for integrating urban and port-industry governance concepts. A novel online platform, VIDEL (Virtual Dashboard of Environmentally Logistics-Port-City), is designed as a smart system that engages all stakeholders. This platform binds the requirements and interests as well as harmonizing actors in the interactions of urban with port and industry to secure innovative and environmental-friendly way. It will become a digital control tower for sustainable governance system in a port-city.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference28 articles.
1. Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017). What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities, 60, 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
2. Beškovnik, B., & Bajec, P. (2021). Strategies and approach for smart city–port ecosystems development supported by the internet of things. Transport, 36(5), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2021.16194
3. Blakeley, C. J., & Matsuura, J. H. (2001). E-goverment: An engine to power e-commerce development. The proceedings of the European conference on e-government. Trinity College.
4. D’Amico, G., Depczyńska, K. S., Dembińska, I., & Ioppolo, G. (2021). Smart and sustainable logistics of port cities: A framework for comprehending enabling factors, domains and goals. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102801
5. Debrie, J., & Raimbault, N. (2016). The port–city relationships in two European inland ports: A geographical perspective on urban governance. Cities, 50, 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.004