Abstract
AbstractThe Covid-19 pandemic has offered some notable examples of how public communication may backfire, in spite of the best intentions of the actors involved, and what role poor argumentative design plays in such failures, in the context of the current digital media ecology. In this chapter, I offer some preliminary considerations on the ongoing struggle to make sense of the new communication technologies in our media reality, analyze a concrete example of argumentative failure in anti-Covid vaccine communication in the European Union, and leverage this case study to issue a call to arms to argumentation scholars: argumentative competence is sorely needed for an effective response to the pandemic, yet argumentation theory will need to join forces with other areas of expertise to realize its societal impact. When it comes to arguments, self-isolation is not a viable strategy to fight Covid-19.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference36 articles.
1. Aakhus, M. (2007). Communication as design. Communication Monographs, 74(1), 112–117.
2. Altheide, D., & Snow, R. (1979). Media logic. SAGE Publications.
3. Aschwanden, C. (2021). Five reasons why COVID herd immunity is probably impossible. Nature, 591(7851), 520–522.
4. Carr, N. (2008). Is Google making us stupid? What the Internet is doing to our brains. The Atlantic Monthly (Jul/Aug 2008).
5. Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. WW Norton & Company.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献