1. D’Elia, G., Mucchi, E.: Comparison of single-input single-output and multi-input multi-output control strategies for performing sequential single-axis random vibration control test. J. Vib. Control. 26(21–22), 1988–2000 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546320909975
2. Bouma, A., Campbell, A., Roberts, T., Taylor, S., Haynes, C., Harvey, D.: Accumulated lifetimes in single-axis vibration testing. In: Walber, C., Walter, P., Seidlitz, S. (eds.) Sensors and Instrumentation, Aircraft/Aerospace, Energy Harvesting & Dynamic Environments Testing. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol. 7, pp. 131–146. Springer, Cham (2020)
3. Gregory, D., Fernando, B., Smallwood, D.O.: Comparison of the response of a simple structure to single axis and multiple axis random vibration inputs. In: Presented at the Shock and Vibration Symposium, Orlando, 2008
4. Ling, H., Shichao, F., Yaoqi, F.: Effect of multi-axis versus single-axis vibration test on the dynamic responses of typical spacecraft structure. ISMA Proceedings, 2012, pp. 2383–2392
5. Soine, D.E., Jones, R.J., Harvie, J.M., Skousen, T.J., Schoenherr, T.F.: Designing hardware for the boundary condition round robin challenge. In: Mains, M., Dilworth, B. (eds.) Topics in Modal Analysis & Testing. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, vol. 9, pp. 119–126. Springer, Cham (2019)