Freedom of Movement

Author:

Conde Belmonte José Enrique,Huesca González Ana María,Villacián Goncer Paloma

Abstract

AbstractUsing comparative data from EXCEPTIUS combined with a focus on some typical country cases, this chapter compares the different restrictions to freedom of movement imposed by European countries. The European experience with restrictions on freedom of movement has been incredibly diverse and mixed. In this way, we can see that many EU Member States not only decided to close their external borders and suspend the freedoms linked to the Schengen area (e.g., by closing airports during the first wave), but in some cases limiting or even restricting mobility between municipalities and regions. The general line regarding movement restrictions in most cases would be limited only to the prohibition for nationals not to leave and for foreigners or non-residents to enter the country. However, in some more extreme or restrictive cases, prohibitions affected local entities of lower rank, including time restrictions and specific mobility limitations. The first part of the chapter delimits the legal framework used to regulate freedom of movement in the EU Member States. It then goes on with an evaluation of the different restrictions adopted by these governments. By doing so, the chapter provides a broad overview of the different and sometimes contradictory measures taken by national governments and other administrative entities, in addition to providing a human rights perspective.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference23 articles.

1. Anderson, M., Mckee, M., & Mossialos, E. (2020). COVID-19 exposes weaknesses in European response to outbreaks. BMJ, 368(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1075

2. Bejan, R. (2020). COVID-19 and disposable migrant workers. Verfassungsblog, April 16. Retrieved April 20, 2022, from https://verfassungsblog.de/COVID-19-and-disposable-migrant-workers

3. Carrera, S., & Chun Luk, N. (2020). In the name of COVID-19: An assessment of the Schengen internal border controls and travel restrictions in the EU. Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Directorate-General for Internal Policies. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/659506/IPOL_STU(2020)659506_EN.pdf

4. Davies, G. T. (2020). Does evidence-based EU law survive the COVID-19 pandemic? Considering the status in EU law of lockdown measures which affect Free Movement. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 2(584486). https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2020.584486

5. Eckardt, M., Kappner, K., & Wolf, N. (2020). COVID-19 across European regions: The role of border controls. Elsevier.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3