Organizational Learning and Digital Transformation: A Theoretical Framework

Author:

Dörner Olaf,Rundel Stefan

Abstract

AbstractThe chapter discusses digital transformation as a potential source of crisis for the organization and develops a theoretical framework for further empirical research. The basic concept is that organizational learning is neither exclusively individually nor structurally and that actors and organizations are in a reciprocal relationship. Different requirements during digital transformation, either from the members of the organization or from the environment, force the organization to handle it. The chapter proposes four different ways, how organizations cope with digital transformation. Within the first two types, previous action routines terminate and organizational learning takes place. (1) The action routines of the members of the organization change, as well as there is a new understanding from the organization (educational process). (2) Digital transformation brings with it the implementation of the new digital objects, although the organizational members don’t act in a generally new way (learning process). Within the last two types, the organization refuses the requirements of the digital transformation. (3) The organization implements digital objects, but the organizational members don’t use them. And finally (4), the organization can actively refuse digital transformation.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference43 articles.

1. Albach, H., Specht, D., & Wildemann, H. (2000). Virtuelle Unternehmen. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, Ergänzungsheft, 2.

2. Arendt, H. (2014). Vita activa oder Vom tätigen Leben (14. Auflage). Piper.

3. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.

4. Aschemann, B. (2017). Die digitale Bereitschaft der Erwachsenenbildung. Der EBmooc für ErwachsenenbildnerInnen. Magazin Erwachsenenbildung.at, 11. Jg., Heft, 30, 10 S.

5. Beck, U. (1996). Das Zeitalter der Nebenfolgen und die Politisierung der Moderne. In Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (Eds.), Reflexive Modernisierung: Eine Kontroverse (S. 19–112). Suhrkamp.

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3