Conclusions

Author:

Bandelli Daniela

Abstract

AbstractThis conclusive chapter offers a few proposals to contribute to the necessary overcoming of the current polarization in the debate: adult-centric arguments could be renovated by focusing on the child as the protagonist of reproduction and representative of tomorrow’s humanity; adult participation in surrogacy could be understood as the result of decision-making influenced by social values of self-determination, with any support or condemnation of surrogacy being grounded on considerations about the social impact of surrogacy and child’s protection and not on the immediate personal benefits that it gives to the adults; the ideal goal of eliminating surrogacy can coexist with pragmatic restrictive regulatory initiatives; monitoring both the surrogates and children’s health and well-being, along with the quantification of surrogacy births are priority objectives to be achieved regardless of prohibitionist or regulatory orientations; inform women who are targets of recruitment about medical and legal risks and individual as well as social implications of surrogacy for their life and for children; single issue campaigns focused on the child and woman’s health can offer platforms of dialogue and mobilization for social movements which on other themes (e.g. abortion, same-sex couples parenting, and women empowerment) have different and even opposing views.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference23 articles.

1. Agnafors, M. (2014). The harm argument against surrogacy revisited: Two versions not to forget. Medical Health Care and Philosophy, 17(3), 357–363.

2. Allen, A. A. (2018). Surrogacy and limitations to freedom of contract: Toward being more fully human. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 41(3), 753–811.

3. Bandelli, D., Gennarini, S., Di Leo, E. (2020). Raising awareness on gestational surrogacy among vulnerable women in developing countries. Working paper for Development Cooperation agencies, International Organisations and NGOs https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351302426_RAISING_AWARENESS_ON_GESTATIONAL_SURROGACY_AMONG_VULNERABLE_WOMEN_IN_DEVELOPING_COUNTRIES

4. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2001). Individualization. Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Sage.

5. Camorrino, A. (2021). Mother nature and the nature of motherhood: Gestational surrogacy and ecospirituality as two postmodern forms of sacralization. Current Sociology, 69(2), 212–230.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3