1. Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: the case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151.
2. Blackmore, J., Bateman, D., Loughlin, J., O’Mara, J., & Aranda, G. (2011). Research into the connection between built learning spaces and student outcomes. Melbourne: Education Policy and Research Division, Department of Education and Early Childhood Development.
3. Bøjer, B. (2019). Unlocking Learning Spaces: An examination of the interplay between the design of learning spaces and pedagogical practices. Doctoral dissertation. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts. https://adk.elsevierpure.com/ws/portalfiles/portal/63453689/Bodil_Bojer_PhDthesis_Unlocking_Learning_Spaces.pdf. Accessed 6 February 2024.
4. Bradbeer, C., Mahat, M., Byers, T., Cleveland, B., Kvan, T., & Imms, W. (2017). The “state of play” concerning New Zealand’s transition to innovative learning environments: Preliminary results from phase one of the ILETC project. Journal of Educational Leadership, Policy and Practice, 32(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.21307/jelpp-2017-003.
5. Cardellino, P., & Woolner, P. (2020). Designing for transformation – a case study of open learning spaces and educational change. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 28(3), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2019.1649297.