Scientific Perspectives, Feminist Standpoints, and Non-Silly Relativism

Author:

Ashton Natalie Alana

Abstract

AbstractDefences of perspectival realism are motivated, in part, by an attempt to find a middle ground between the realist intuition that science seems to tell us a true story about the world, and the Kuhnian intuition that scientific knowledge is historically and culturally situated. The first intuition pulls us towards a traditional, absolutist scientific picture, and the second towards a relativist one. Thus, perspectival realism can be seen as an attempt to secure situated knowledge without entailing epistemic relativism. A very similar motivation is behind feminist standpoint theory, a view which aims to capture the idea that knowledge is socially situated whilst retaining some kind of absolutism. Elsewhere I argue that the feminist project fails to achieve this balance; its commitment to situated knowledge unavoidably entails epistemic relativism (though of an unproblematic kind), which allows them to achieve all of their feminist goals. In this paper I will explore whether the same arguments apply to perspectival realism. And so I will be asking whether perspectival realism too is committed to an unproblematic kind of relativism, capable of achieving scientific goals; or, whether it succeeds in carving out a third view, between or beyond the relativism/absolutism dichotomy.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference27 articles.

1. Anderson, E. (1995). Feminist epistemology: An interpretation and a defense. Hypatia, 10(3), 50–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x.

2. Ashton, N.A. (forthcoming). Relativising epistemic advantage. In The Routledge handbook of philosophy of relativism.

3. Ashton, N.A. (forthcoming). Evidence, relativism and Progress in feminist standpoint theory. In The Routledge handbook of evidence.

4. Ashton, N.A., & McKenna R. (forthcoming 2018). Situating feminist epistemology. Episteme.

5. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ludwik Fleck’s reasonable relativism about science;Synthese;2023-01-21

2. Post-Truth Phenomenology;Constructed Truths;2023

3. Post-Truth Epistemology;Constructed Truths;2023

4. Relationships between Recreation and Pollution When Striving for Wellbeing in Blue Spaces;International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2022-03-31

5. Wittgenstein and the Social Sciences;ANTHEM STUD WITTGENS;2020-07-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3