Regulating Chinese and North American Digital Media in Australia: Facebook and WeChat as Case Studies

Author:

Su Chunmeizi

Abstract

AbstractAs the Australian government has legislated for a ‘News Media and Digital Platforms Mandatory Bargaining Code’ to compel Google and Facebook to pay for news content, platform regulation in Australia has prompted a heated discussion worldwide. Questionable business practices have incited issues such as anti-competition behaviour, online harms, disinformation, algorithmic advertising, trade of data, privacy breaches and so on. Consequently, these technology tycoons are reinscribing industries and societies alike, posing a threat to digital democracy. This chapter examines how Facebook and WeChat are (or should be) regulated in Australia, the current regulatory frameworks, and the overall effectiveness of self-regulation. Through the lenses of comparative research, this study is focused on infrastructuralisation, techno-nationalism (censorship), and civil society (media diversity), to identify distinct features and common themes in platform regulation and explore possible solutions to regulating global platforms in Australia.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference50 articles.

1. ACCC. 2019. Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report. https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Digital%20platforms%20inquiry%20-%20final%20report.pdf

2. Andrews, Leighton. 2019. Facebook, the Media and Democracy: Big Tech, Small State? Routledge.

3. Baxter, Andrew. 2019. “Marketing to the Million plus Australian Chinese Consumers.” Sydney Business Insights, September 24, 2019. https://sbi.sydney.edu.au/marketing-to-the-million-plus-australian-chinese-consumers/.

4. BBC News. 2021. “Facebook’s Trump Ban Upheld by Oversight Board for Now,” May 5, 2021, sec. Technology. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56985583.

5. Beecher, Eric. 2021. “Digital Bargaining Code Needs to Protect Australia’s Media Diversity.” InDaily, February 1, 2021. https://indaily.com.au/opinion/2021/02/02/digital-bargaining-code-needs-to-protect-australias-media-diversity/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3