Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference35 articles.
1. Alter, K. J. (2006). Private litigants and the new international courts. Comparative Political Studies, 39(1), 22–49.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005283216
2. Arnardóttir, O. M. (2017). Res interpretata, erga omnes effect and the role of the margin of appreciation in giving domestic effect to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights. The European Journal of International Law, 28(3), 819–843.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chx045
3. Blokker, N. (2015). The governance of international courts and tribunals: Organizing and guaranteeing independence and accountability - A appeal for research. European Society of International Law (ESIL) 2015 Annual Conference (Oslo). SSRN:
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2709626
or
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2709626
4. Burgh House Principles on the Independence of the International Judiciary: “The court and the judges shall exercise their functions free from direct or indirect interference or influence by any person or entity”. Retrieved April 5, 2019, from
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/international-courts/sites/international-courts/files/burgh_final_21204.pdf
5. Carozza, P. G. (2003). Subsidiarity as a structural principle of international human rights law. American Journal of International Law, 97, 38–79. Retrieved April 5, 2019, from
https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1571&context=law_faculty_scholarship