Author:
Parsons Meg,Fisher Karen,Crease Roa Petra
Abstract
AbstractAround the world, many societies are trying to create and apply apparatuses that recognise Indigenous interests in freshwater systems. Such policies and strategies often acknowledge Indigenous peoples’ rights and values they attached to specific waterways, and take the form of new legal agreements which are directed at reconciling diverse worldviews, values, and ways of life within particular environments. In this chapter we review one such arrangement: the co-governance arrangements between the Māori iwi (tribe) Ngāti Maniapoto and the New Zealand (Government) to co-govern and co-manage the Waipā River. We analysis where the new governance arrangements are enabling Ngāti Maniapoto to achieve environmental justice and find substantive faults most notably distributive inequities, lack of participatory parity, and inadequate recognition of Māori governance approaches.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference123 articles.
1. Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Chapin Iii, F. S., & Ellemor, H. (2011). This Must Be the Place: Underrepresentation of Identity and Meaning in Climate Change Decision-Making. Global Environmental Politics, 11(2), 1–25.
2. Ahmad, N. B. (2019). Mask Off – The Coloniality of Environmental Justice. Widener Law Review, 25, 195.
3. Amohanga, J., Ormsby, R., & Ormsby, M. (1997). Further Response on Behalf of Nehenehenui Regional Management Committee Submission by Jacqui Amohanga, Rachael Ormsby, and Massey Ormsby, 24 November 1997. 60 41 51A, Volume 2. Hamilton: Waikato Regional Council. Unpublished.
4. Arsenault, R., Bourassa, C., Diver, S., McGregor, D., & Witham, A. (2019). Including Indigenous Knowledge Systems in Environmental Assessments: Restructuring the Process. Global Environmental Politics, 19(3), 120–132.
5. Bächtiger, A., & Parkinson, J. (2019). Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.