Work and Support for Patients Outside Hospital

Author:

Freebody Jane

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter examines whether the rehabilitative remit of patient workhad decreased in importance during the interwar years compared to during the nineteenth century. Despite the need to rebuild their respective economies after World War I, and the high unemployment of the Great Depression, patient occupation in French and English asylums did not appear to prepare patients for the modern workplace, as Freebody’s comparison of the work available locally to the work provided in linstitutions demonstrates. The work around the hospital tended to be based on outmoded artisanal techniques in France, while in England, occupational therapy, in the form of arts and crafts, was the antithesis of modern working practices, such as those associated with “scientific labour management”. Freebody attempts to explain this anomaly in terms of  a focus on the "active treatment" of patients, rather than vocational rehabilitation, and increased levels of support for patients post-discharge in England, and to the emphasis on the financial contribution made by patient labour to asylum budgets in France.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference67 articles.

1. Accampo, Elinor, Rachel Fuchs and Mary Lynn Stewart. Gender and the Politics of Social Reform in France, 1870–1914. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995.

2. Andrews, Jonathan, Asa Briggs, Roy Porter, Penny Tucker, and Keir Waddington. The History of Bethlem. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 1997.

3. Bartlett, Peter. “The Asylum and the Poor Law: The Productive Alliance.” In Insanity, Institutions and Society, 1800–1914: A Social History of Madness in Comparative Perspective, edited by Joseph Melling and Bill Forsythe, 48–67. London and New York: Routledge, 1999.

4. Blakesley, Rosalind. The Arts and Crafts Movement. London and New York : Phaidon, 2006.

5. Blayney, Steffan. “Industrial Fatigue and the Productive Body: the science of work in Britain, 1900–1918.” Social History of Medicine 32 no. 2 (2019): 310–28.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3