Author:
Parviainen Jaana,Coeckelbergh Mark
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference41 articles.
1. Bryson, J. (2010). Robots should be slaves. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Close engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues (pp. 63–74). John Benjamins.
2. Butterworth, J., & Wildschut, L. (Eds.). (2009). Contemporary choreography: A critical reader. Routledge.
3. Calo, R. (2016). Robots in American law (University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2016–04). Retrieved September 13, 2022, from http://euro.ecom.cmu.edu/program/law/08-732/AI/Calo.pdf
4. Coeckelbergh, M. (2010). Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 209. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9235-5
5. Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Growing moral relations: Critique of moral status ascription. Palgrave Macmillan.