Abstract
AbstractThis contribution maps and analyses the definition, purpose, and content of alternative legal proceedings in custody conflicts in the various Scandinavian legal systems. It finds that such proceedings occur both as part of legal and social services, but there is a lack of coordination between them. Expert mediators are involved in some of the proceedings, but their qualifications and methods are not yet defined. Ultimately, the conclusion is drawn that the lack of clear content, role definition, and coordination, results in alternative legal proceedings that insufficiently account for the rights and perspectives of the child.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference63 articles.
1. Ådnanes M, Haugen M G D, Jensberg H, Husum T L and Rantalaiho M, ‘Hva karakteriserer vanskelige saker i foreldremekling, og er meklingsordningen godt nok tilpasset?’ (2011) Fokus på Familien 86.
2. Agency of Family Law Instruction VEJ no 9404 of 26 June 2020.
3. Amato P R, ‘The Consequences of Divorce for Adults and Children’ (2002) Journal of Marriage and the Family 1269.
4. Anderson S R, Andersin S A, Palmer K L and Mutchler M S, ‘Defining High Conflicts’ (2011) The American Journal of Family Therapy 11.
5. Angvik Ipsen K, ‘Meklere som lekmenn eller meklere som profesjonelle aktører?’ (2008) Kart og plan 240.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献