Fragmentation: A Trait of the Romanian Political Elite

Author:

Martin-Russu LuanaORCID

Abstract

AbstractWith this chapter, Martin-Russu starts her empirical analysis by examining the structural factors that influence the composition and conduct of the Romanian political elite. The observed high level of fragmentation of this elite during the last decades results from a narrow and shallow pattern of elite renewal, from conflicting institutional or organizational interests and from a lack of value consensus among elite members. All these factors exacerbate a struggle for power, they work in favour of a pursuit of narrow particular interests at high levels of decision-making, leading to the failure of democracy even where democratic institutions are in place.The chapter shows a political environment in which the major Romanian political parties experience numerous splits and mergers, several opportunistic coalitions are forged in the run-up to or midway between parliamentary elections, and numerous party members abruptly change their affiliation in order to obtain secure political positions. It provides a revealing example of over-fragmentation: a political climate of distrust, uncertainty and unpredictability that favours self-interested behaviour, and in which elected elites can be bound neither to take account of the preferences of their own party, nor to take into account the concerns of their electorate.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference49 articles.

1. Anghel, V. (2012). The Challenges of Liberal Democracy: A study of the reconversion of Romanian communist elites in transition to democracy. Revue des Sciences Politiques, 2012, 12–21.

2. Anghel, V. (2017). Alliance-Building Strategies in Post-communist Romania (1990-2016). Bonding through Dependence? Südosteuropa Mitteilungen, 2017, 16–29.

3. Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2014). BTI 2014 – Romania Country Report (Gütersloh).

4. Bertelsmann Stiftung. (2016). BTI 2016 – Romania Country Report (Gütersloh).

5. Best, H., & Higley, J. (2010). Introduction: Democratic elitism reappraised. In H. Best & J. Higley (Eds.), Democratic elitism. New theoretical and comparative perspectives. International studies in sociology and social anthropology (Vol. 111, pp. 1–22). Brill.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A New Tool to Tackle Hostile Femoral Access in TAVR;JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions;2023-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3