Lessons Learned from Historical Failures, Limitations and Successes of AI/ML in Healthcare and the Health Sciences. Enduring Problems, and the Role of Best Practices

Author:

Aliferis Constantin,Simon Gyorgy

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter covers a variety of cases studies-based incidents and concepts that are valuable for identifying pitfalls, suggesting best practices and supporting their use. Examples include: the Gartner hype cycle; the infamous “AI winters”; limitations of early-stage knowledge representation and reasoning methods; overfitting; using methods not built for the task; over-estimating the value and potential or early and heuristic technology; developing AI disconnected with real-life needs and application contexts; over-interpreting theoretical shortcomings of one algorithm to all algorithms in the class; misinterpreting computational learning theory; failures/shortcomings of literature including technically erroneous information and persistence of incorrect findings; meta research yielding unreliable results; failures/shortcomings of modeling protocols, data and evaluation designs (e.g., competitions); failures/shortcomings of specific projects and technologies; and also contextual factors that may render guidelines themselves problematic. These case studies were often followed by improved technology that overcame various limitations. The case studies reinforce, and demonstrate the value of science-driven practices for addressing enduring and new challenges.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference153 articles.

1. O’Leary DE. Gartner’s hype cycle and information system research issues. Int J Account Inform Syst. 2008;9(4):240–52.

2. Russell SJ. Artificial intelligence a modern approach. Pearson Education Inc; 2010.

3. AI Winter. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_winter

4. Marcus G (2022) Deep learning is hitting a wall. Nautilus, Accessed, pp. 03–11.

5. Minsky M, Papert S. An introduction to computational geometry. Cambridge TIASS., HIT, 479, p. 480; 1969.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3