Islamic Principles, Inclusivity and Revitalisation in Conceptual Frameworks for Western Social Work

Author:

Crabtree Sara Ashencaen

Abstract

AbstractIn considering the important contribution of Islamic principles and perspectives to social work, which has encompassed to-date both the etic (outsider) and an emic (insider) positionality, a dialectical stance is offered in this chapter. This takes a fused ‘etemic’ approach, where Islamic religious and cultural concepts are critically examined in a dialogical application towards and excursus of an adaptive understanding of how these abstracted notions can play out within a social work context. To this end, the following concepts: ʾumma, zakat, ʿizza and al-insān al-kāmil, which are Islamic beliefs or Muslim cultural practices, are discussed as offering powerful and evocative socio-cultural-religious constructs that can serve to illuminate professional social work. Such insights, however, are subject to caveats and qualifications regarding the contentious appropriateness of this kind of abstracted, discursive application as well as whether such concepts can or should be adopted in some fashion within social work. However, the International Federation of Social Work’s (IFSW) global definition of social work provides a useful porous framework for such a legitimate exercise in the IFSW’s attempts to depart from narrow ethnocentricism to both recognise and embrace the cultural diversity that constitutes this global profession.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference61 articles.

1. Al-Krenawi, A., & Graham, J. R. (1999). Social work and Koranic mental health healers. International Social Work, 42(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/002087289904200106

2. Al-Krenawi, A., & Graham, J. R. (2007). Social work intervention with Bedouin-Arab children in the context of blood vengeance. Violence and Abuse Abstracts, 5(4), 283–296.

3. Al-Shamsi, M. S. A., & Fulcher, L. C. (2005). The impact of polygamy on United Arab Emirates’ first wives and their children. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 8(1), 46–55.

4. Ashencaen Crabtree, S. (2012). A rainforest asylum: The enduring legacy of colonial psychiatric care in Malaysia. Whiting & Birch.

5. Ashencaen Crabtree, S. (2014). Islamophobia and the Manichean constructions of the ‘other’: A contemporary European problematic. In S. Ashencaen Crabtree (Ed.), Diversity and the processes of marginalisation and otherness: Giving voice to hidden themes – A European perspective (pp. 33–48). Whiting and Birch.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3