NTA as a Democratization Tool

Author:

Smith David J.

Abstract

AbstractHaving been implemented in several contexts and extensively discussed internationally during 1900–1940, NTA largely disappeared from the international legal and political agenda immediately after World War Two, only to again attract interest from scholars and policymakers from the 1960s onwards. This revived interest partly reflected the emergence of new multicultural models of state and citizenship—and attendant NTA-style arrangements for minorities—in some established Western democracies but was given further impetus by the start of democratisation in Central and Eastern Europe following the end of communist rule in the region. The adoption of laws and institutional arrangements bearing the NTA label in Hungary, Estonia, Russia, Slovenia, Croatia, Montenegro and Serbia (among others) coincided with the elaboration of new international standards on minority protection by European and Euro-Atlantic International Organizations, which today serve as a benchmark against which different forms of NTA can be assessed in terms of their potential to support democratization and the sustainable accommodation of ethnic diversity. This chapter first examines the origins and drivers of the new more contemporary variants of NTA, before sketching the main lines of how a democratic NTA arrangement should look. This ideal-type model is then used to assess contemporary examples of NTA and their potential to support democratization (or otherwise) in post-Cold War Europe.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference25 articles.

1. Agarin, T., & McGarry, A. (2014). Unpacking the Roma Participation Puzzle: Presence Voice and Influence. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 40(12), 1972–1990.

2. Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge University Press.

3. Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. (1990a, June 29). Document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE, Copenhagen. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/9/c/14304.pdf

4. Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. (1990b, November 19–21). Charter of Paris for a New Europe, Paris. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/0/6/39516.pdf

5. Council of Europe Advisory Committee on the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. (2016, May 27). The Framework Convention: A Key Tool to Managing Diversity Through Minority Rights (Thematic Commentary No. 4: The Scope of Application of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities). Strasbourg. ACFC/56DOC(2016)001.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3