Author:
Löbner Sebastian,Gamerschlag Thomas,Kalenscher Tobias,Schrenk Markus,Zeevat Henk
Abstract
AbstractIn order to help to explain cognition, cognitive structures are assumed to be present in the mind/brain. While the empirical investigation of such structures is the task of cognitive psychology, the other cognitive science disciplines like linguistics, philosophy and artificial intelligence have an important role in suggesting hypotheses. Researchers in these disciplines increasingly test such hypotheses by empirical means themselves. In philosophy, the traditional way of referring to such structures is via concepts, i.e. those mental entities by which we conceive reality and with the help of which we reason and plan. Linguists traditionally refer to the cognitive structures as meanings—at least those linguists with a mentalistic concept of meaning do who do not think of meaning as extra-mental entities.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference49 articles.
1. Barsalou, L. W. (1992a). Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields. In A. Lehrer & E. F. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, fields, and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization (pp. 21–74). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1992b). Cognitive psychology. An overview for cognitive scientists. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
4. Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Continuity of the conceptual system across species. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 309–311.
5. Birrell, J. M., & Brown, V. J. (2000). Medial frontal cortex mediates perceptual attentional set shifting in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 4320–4324.