Grading Similarity

Author:

Umbach Carla,Gust Helmar

Abstract

AbstractThere are numerous words across languages expressing similarity or indistinguishability. In this paper, three types of similarity expressions in German and English are compared—ähnlich/similar, so/such, and gleich/same. They differ in a number of respects, one of them being gradability: While ähnlich/similar are gradable, so/such as well as gleich/same are not. The analysis in this paper starts from the analysis of German so as a demonstrative expressing similarity (instead of identity) to its demonstration target (Umbach and Gust 2014). It is suggested that the meaning of the three types of similarity expressions is based on a common similarity relation, while differences in meaning are provided by constraints referring to the selection of dimensions of comparison and preconditions of usage. The focus of the paper is on gradability and on the question of what it means for a pair of items to be more similar than another pair. An analysis in the spirit of Klein (1980) is presented accounting for the fact that ähnlich/similar are gradable while neither so/such nor gleich/same are. The formal framework makes use of representations based on attribute spaces and classifiers, where representations may be of different granularity.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference32 articles.

1. Alrenga, P. (2007). Dimensions in the semantics of comparatives. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.

2. Anderson, C., & Morzycki, M. (2015). Degrees as kinds. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 33–3, 791–821.

3. Barker, C. (2010). Nominals don’t provide criteria of identity. In M. Rathert & A. Alexiadou (Eds.), The semantics of nominalizations across languages and frameworks (pp. 9–24). de Gruyter Berlin.

4. Beck, S. (2000). The semantics of different. Comparison operator and relational adjective. Linguistics & Philosophy, 23(2), 101–139.

5. Bierwisch, M. (1987). Semantik der Graduierung. In M. Bierwisch & E. Lang (Eds.), Grammatische und konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensionsadjektiven (pp. 91–286). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Thedoubt-whetherpuzzle;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

2. Locating the locative in English pseudo-locativewhere-relatives;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

3. ‘Why’ without asking in Romanian;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

4. Asking about the reason for an effect, and some consequences for the analysis ofwh-interrogatives;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

5. Embedding force and attitude;Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses;2023-07-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3