Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference8 articles.
1. Diamond, A.: Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 135–168 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
2. Allakhverdov, V.M., Allakhverdov, M.V.: Stroop effect: interference as a logic paradox [Фeнoмeн Cтpyпa: интepфepeнция кaк лoгичecкий пapaдoкc]. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Psychology. Pedagogy [Becтник Caнкт-Пeтepбypгcкoгo yнивepcитeтa. Cepия 16. Пcиxoлoгия. Пeдaгoгикa], 4, 90–102 (2014). (in Russian)
3. Hasshim, N., Parris, B.A.: Trial type mixing substantially reduces the response set effect in the Stroop task. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 189, 43–53 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.03.002
4. Durgin, F.H.: The reverse Stroop effect. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7(1), 121–125 (2000)
5. Sobel, K.V., Puri, A.M., York, A.K.: Visual search inverts the classic Stroop asymmetry. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 205, 103054 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103054