Abstract
AbstractEffective exploration techniques during mechanized tunneling are of high importance in order to prevent severe surface settlements as well as a damage of the tunnel boring machine, which in turn would lead to additional costs and a standstill in the construction process. A seismic methodology called full waveform inversion can bring a considerable improvement compared to state-of-the-art seismic methods in terms of precision. Another method of exploration during mechanized tunneling is to continuously monitor subsurface behavior and then use this data to identify disturbances through pattern recognition and machine learning techniques. Various probabilistic methods for conducting system identification and proposing an appropriate monitoring plan are developed in this regard. Furthermore, ground conditions can be determined by studying boring machine data collected during the excavation. The active and passive obtained data during performance of a shield driven machine were used to estimate soil parameters. The monitoring campaign can be extended to include above-ground structural surveillance as well as terrestrial and satellite data to track displacements of existing infrastructure caused by tunneling. The available radar data for the Wehrhahn-line project are displayed and were utilized to precisely monitor the process of anticipated uplift by injections and any subsequent ground building settlements.
Funder
Ruhr Universität Bochum, Germany
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference128 articles.
1. J. B. Ajo-Franklin. “Frequency-domain Modeling Techniques for the Scalar Wave Equation: An Introduction”. In: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Earth Resources Laboratory (2005).
2. H. Akima. “A Method of Bivariate Interpolation and Smooth Surface Fitting for Irregularly Distributed Data Points”. In: ACM Transactions on Mathematical. Software 4.2 (June 1978), pp. 148–159.
3. S. Arangio et al. “Assessment of structural damage due to ground settlements by using the DInSAR technique”. In: Life-Cycle and Sustainability of Civil Infrastructure Systems (IALCCE 2012). 2012, pp. 1897–1904.
4. S. Atamturktur et al. “Defining coverage of an operational domain using a modified nearest-neighbor metric”. In: Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 50-51 (2015), pp. 349–361.
5. R. Bamler, S. Hinz, and M. Eineder. “SAR-Interferometrie für geodätische Anwendungen”. In: Allgemeine Vermessungsnachrichten (AVN). 2008, pp. 243–252.