Assessing the Quality of Mentoring: Evidence-Based Development of a Training Programme for Biology Mentors and Pre-service Biology Teachers for Scientific Issues

Author:

Nestler Emanuel,Retzlaff-Fürst Carolin,Groß Jorge

Abstract

AbstractMentoring is a key scaffold where pre-service biology teachers are supported by an experienced biology teacher (i.e. a mentor). A SWOT analysis revealed that our federal state is missing biology mentor teacher (BMT) training. We conducted a design-based research study to create a training programme for our biology mentor teachers. The first aim of the study was to develop the theoretical background for the complex process for biology mentor teacher training. The tetrahedron model developed by Prediger and colleagues was adapted to describe the challenging situation for BMT training. Our second aim was to evaluate the mentoring quality and subject-specific content of mentoring dialogues in the design cycle to connect this study to previous research. Our results show that mentoring quality increases after BMT training. Surprisingly, the mentor teacher and the pre-service teacher differ in their assessment. The evaluation of content of mentoring dialogues shows a higher share of discussions on content knowledge than in previous studies. All in all, this is one of the first studies on BMT training. This paper is an invitation to continue the work in this important field of biology teacher training.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference38 articles.

1. Barnett, E., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2015). Educative mentoring: How a mentor supported a preservice biology teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge development. Journal of Science Teacher Training, 26, 647–668.

2. Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9, 469–520.

3. Beutel, D., & Spooner-Lane, R. (2009). Building mentoring capacities in experienced teachers. International Journal of Learning, 16, 1–10.

4. Bromme, R., & Jucks, R. (2014). Fragen Sie ihren Arzt oder Apotheker: Die Psychologie der Experten-Laien-Kommunikation. In M. Blanz, A. Florack, & U. Piontkowski (Eds.), Kommunikation. Eine interdisziplinäre Einführung (pp. 237–246). Kohlhammer.

5. Carter, T. J., & Dunning, D. (2008). Faulty self-assessment: Why evaluating one’s own competence is an intrinsically difficult task. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00031.x

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3