Engaged Research: Strengthening Research Teams Through Community Researchers

Author:

Schroeder Doris,Chatfield Kate,Chennells Roger,Partington Hazel,Kimani Joshua,Thomson Gillian,Odhiambo Joyce Adhiambo,Snyders Leana,Louw Collin

Abstract

AbstractEngaged research, which strengthens research teams through community researchers, offers many opportunities and challenges. From better access to community members who are hard to reach, to the collection of more meaningful and authentic data, and greater trustworthiness of research findings, the benefits for research are manifold. However, research has also shown that community researchers might be overtly biased, only collect superficial data or lack the confidence to probe deeply enough, among other challenges. Simultaneously, the literature on community researchers is heavily biased towards high-income countries, and there is very little to be found on experiences from low-and middle-income countries that goes beyond assistance in obtaining informed consent. This chapter starts to close that gap by presenting a case study involving 12 community researchers from the South African San community. Collecting no personal data and obtaining all research input through community researchers shows that research led by vulnerable groups for vulnerable groups is possible. It is one way of ensuring that the San, and wider research communities, have access to research they can trust.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference87 articles.

1. Aguirre-Bastos C, Chaves-Chaparro J, Arico S (eds) (2019) Co-Designing Science in Africa: first steps in assessing the sustainability science approach on the ground. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000368900. Accessed 21 Sept 2023

2. Asari E-M (2019) Inform–consult–involve–collaborate–empower. Int J Gov Audit 46:18–21

3. Balcazar FE, Garcia-Iriarte E, Suarez-Balcazar Y (2009) Participatory action research with Colombian immigrants. Hisp J Behav Sci 31(1):112–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986308327080

4. Baum F, MacDougall C, Smith D (2006) Participatory action research. J Epidemiol Community Health 60:854–857. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.028662

5. Burns S, Schubotz D (2009) Demonstrating the merits of the peer research process: a Northern Ireland case study. Field Methods 21(3):309–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X09333514

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3