Author:
Bates Jo,Checco Alessandro,Gerakopoulou Elli
Abstract
AbstractCrowdwork platforms such as Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) are a crucial infrastructural component of our global data assemblage. Through these platforms, low-paid crowdworkers perform the vital labour of manually labelling large-scale and complex datasets, labels that are needed to train machine learning and AI models (Tubaro et al., Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2020) and which enable the functioning of much digital technology, from niche applications to global platforms such as Google, Amazon and Facebook.In this chapter, we reflect on how a ‘design justice’ approach might be valuable to build on insights gained from a series of exploratory discussions we have engaged in with US-based crowdworkers about how a crowdworker co-operative might work in practice, and begin to sketch out a potential software architecture that could form the basis of future participative approaches to the design and development of a crowdworker co-operative.We begin by describing and reflecting on our own evolving methodology and how it fits with the ‘design justice’ lens we propose for future work. Following this, we present findings from our discussions with crowdworkers about how a crowdwork co-operative might work in practice, including what values workers would like to see embedded in the design. We then finish with the outline of a prototype software architecture for a crowdworker co-operative that could be used as a starting point in future design work in collaboration with crowdworkers.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference30 articles.
1. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
2. Aroyo, L., Dumitrache, A., Paritosh, P., Quinn, A., Welty, C., Checco, A., Demartini, G., Gadiraju, U., & Sarasua, C. (eds.). (2018, July 5). Proceedings of the 1st workshop on subjectivity, ambiguity and disagreement in crowdsourcing, and short paper proceedings of the 1st workshop on disentangling the relation between crowdsourcing and bias management (SAD 2018 and CrowdBias 2018), Zürich, Switzerland. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2276/
3. Bardram, J. (1998a). Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities. CSCW ’98: Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1145/289444.289483
4. Bardram, J. E. (1998b). Collaboration, coordination, and computer support. DAIMI.
5. Bardzell, S., et al. (2012, June). Critical design and critical theory: The challenge of designing for provocation. DIS ’12: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318001
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献