Abstract
AbstractThree organizing agentic modalities consistently occur, namely, individuals, relational groups, and collectives of various kinds. Digital augmentation transforms these modalities. Particularly, the infusion of artificial agency compresses traditional hierarchies and layers. It also strengthens organizing capabilities, enabling new agentic forms and functions. Yet human agency is likely to remain layered and relatively uncompressed. Therefore, augmented agentic modality could be either more fluid and flattened, or internally conflicted. This chapter examines these developments and highlights the changing nature of procedural habit and routine, as key mediators of agentic modality, mindful that habit forms the scaffold for individual personality, and collective routine for collectivity. When these patterns of action are digitalized, they become more dynamic and generative. Although here, too, risks and dilemmas emerge, regarding the potential divergence and convergence of agentic modalities.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference81 articles.
1. Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13–17.
2. Arrow, K. J. (1997). The functions of social choice theory. In K. J. Arrow, A. Sen, & K. Suzumura (Eds.), Social choice re-examined (Vol. 1). St. Martin’s Press.
3. Arrow, K. J., Sen, A., & Suzumura, K. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of social choice and welfare (Vol. 2). Elsevier.
4. Augoustinos, M. (1999). Ideology, false consciousness and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 9(3), 295–312.
5. Aydin, M. N., & Perdahci, N. Z. (2019). Dynamic network analysis of online interactive platform. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(2), 229–240.